Computer Problems at Nuclear Plants When the Millennium Changes
|When the next
millennium arrives, will the nuclear power plants shut down?... or maybe "blow
up" ? What will happen: explosion, sudden shutdown, or will everything be normal?
For the past several months, even years, the computer industry has been discussing this theme, sometimes heatedly, at other times apparently unconcerned: how will the computer programs, operating systems, microprocessors and clocks react, if the jump is into the next millennium? What will happen if, from one second to the next on 31.12.1999, the date 1.1.2000 follows? Will the computers and their software swallow that without complaint, and continue operating in accordance with their programs? Or will they simply "crash" and quit?...and if so, what will be the consequences?
Many programs developed in the 60's. 70's, and 80's didn't take into consideration that the century would come to an end. Their main concern back then was storage....each bit and byte had to be turned three times, because even the large "mainframe" computers were equipped with only one, two, or sometimes eight megabytes of memory. So the programmers simply abstained from mentioning the century, in order to save storage space. But with this logic, somebody who was born 31.10.99 must have first seen the light of the world in the year 1899.
On 31.12.1999 about 23:59:59, a single second will ring in the new year 1.1.00 with champagne and fireworks. But which computer will actually know what hour has come? Will the clock fall back to 1.1.1900? Or maybe to 1.1.1970 (the artificial birthdate of WIntel and Co.)? Or will the calculator just count on, unimpressed by the new millennium?
Thousands of programmers are devoting time to this "Y2P", (the Year 2000 problem). In the digital world, millions, even billions of dollars are being considered for the production of software "updates", "patches " or by totally replacing whole EDP-systems. Sometimes the danger is fully overrated. Horror scenarios are depicted at sales-generating seminars where the main motivation is the potential profits of the "experts".
Its true that YP2 could produce strange effects for banks, insurance companies, stores, or government administrative offices. For example, such a "time jump" might mean that the cash registers at a supermarket couldnt be opened and that the safes in banks would be permanently locked...because the computers thought that, since the date was 1.1.1900, money would be needed again only in a hundred years. Or perhaps your tax returns (in Euro?) could lie around for 30 years? That will have surely unpleasant material consequences. Things would be put out of joint. That might happen in our complex world of rules and systems, if these Y2P "bugs" (programming errors) were suddenly to come to the surface. Free reign should be granted to the imagination, because even the craftiest experts probably wont think of everything.
The opponents of nuclear power already have a reputation as "enemies of technology" and "defeatist", but this topic has an especially bitter taste.
Because who can be definitely certain that when the new millenium arrives, there wont be any problems in the 420 computer-controlled atomic plants that are now in operation throughout the world? The possibility of a big bang an uncontrolled reaction at midnight, just because someone overlooked a single switch somewhere in all that complex hard- and software, is not that far-fetched.
There remains only the possibility of an immediate shutdown. Thats been our demand for some time: "shut down NOW!" But wouldnt the computers also have to be programmed to handle such an emergency?
Siemens and the other atomic geniuses throughout the world say that we atomic opponents have a "bee in our bonnets". They accuse us of "scaremongering
devoid of real groundwork", calling us "flipped-out green rioters" if we bring out these questions. Hopefully, theyre right: in that case our fears are without foundation. Surely, those herds of highly qualified computer scientists must have searched the software at least a hundred times over. German security technology leads the world in this respect. Thats what they tell us.
But what about the many reactors that cant be updated, because they use neither German nor American software and the technology isnt interchangeable?
Or arent being fixed for economic reasons or a lack of consciousness of the problem? How much do we really know about the reactors in the former Soviet Union, China, or elsewhere that were built with non-Western technology?
Therefore during the coming months well devote this page to discussion as to whether there are actually any atomic installations, including reactors, research institutions and reprocessing plants that still havent solved their Y2P problem, where the possibility of an uncontrolled reaction cant be completely eliminated. We ask all computer scientists, physicists, atomic technicians and control engineers to turn your concrete thoughts to this topic and then to spread your ideas world-wide through this site.
Chernobyl has demonstrated to all of us that the world is round and that radioactivity knows no borders. Therefore were calling on anybody who is familiar with this problem to enter the discussion, gather information, check facts, and share with us, in order that we all may discover any possible security gaps. The end of the 20th century mustnt mean a repetition of Chernobyl in the new millenium.
We at CASTOR-NIX-DA! Are only concerned laymen. If our worries should be unfounded you may laugh at us, and well be glad to laugh with you.
But first we have many questions. For example,
- Which hardware is used in for the control of an atomic plant? Discreetly based calculators? Microprocessors? INTEL-Chips? Or other types? And since when? Which time control chips?
- Which software steers the controls? Is it independent from the operating systems and close to the machines? Or is it a modern type capable of operating in developing environments? Within the regulatory or control system, can an hour/date problem have any effect at all, or can this be excluded?
For example, we know that in America during the 80s, the "Altos" computer was installed to control atomic plants. These computers employed the latest 286 chips, ran on a Unix operating system, and were considered absolutely modern.
But was the Y2P problem taken into account then? If not, have the computers been switched, or are they still in use in accordance with the well-known EDP principle, "never touch a running system"?
At the end of the 80s in Germany at least, programs for atomic plants were developed for use with "Primos" computers. These systems are definitely not Y2P-proof. In what language were the programs written - Fortran 77, Cobol, or Pascal? In any case the "Primos" operating system recognizes only two-digit years.
For the widely used Unix computers, the well known Sun company has prepared an update package for their Solaris control system. This is said to include a Y2P-patch....but who can definitely say that all problems have thereby been solved?
Programmers have defined "time", in the absence of definitive standards, according to their own moods and desires. Some start their systems at 1.1.00, by which they mean 1.1.1900. Others use the "hour of birth of the p.c.", fixed on 1.1.1970 in order that the computer can grasp the transcience of time. Still others, the programmers of Excel, for example, (refer to ct August and September issues) even require complex curves to calculate how many hours have passed from 19:00 until 3:00 in the morning; if a negative value is given the program answers straightaway with "error".
What happens, if in the year 2000 the value "00" must suddenly be calculated?
"Stack overflow", "segmentation violation", a crash because of an attempt to divide by zero?
"Murphy's laws" are valid...not only for EDP generally, but specifically at atomic plants. "What can happen, will happen." Like at the Esensham/Unterweser
plant a few weeks ago when a fuel rod got stuck during a change. It wouldnt go forwards or backwards....and that wasnt anticipated. As of now we havent heard that theyve come up with a solution. "Murphy" lives again...and will also in the year 2000!
We ask everybody to set their minds to this topic...to exchange with friends and fellow workers...worldwide, because the problem is international. Send your thoughts or ideas by e-mail to CASTOR-NIX-DAemail@example.com If you are aware of other sources, facts or data on the Internet, please let us know, and well publish them on our link lists.
CASTOR-NIX-DA!!! SHUT DOWN THE ATOMIC PLANTS!!! IMMEDIATELY! BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!!!
Dieter Metk, 6.9.(19)98
Bearbeitet am: 14.09.1998/ad
zurück zur Homepage